BREAKING NEWS
latest

Chennai City Gangsters Tamil Movie Review

The Tamil movie Chennai City Gangsters was released on October 4, 2024. Here is a detailed review of the film.



Chennai City Gangsters: A Gangster Spoof That's More Gags Than Gangster

One-Liner: A gangster comedy that packs a few genuine laughs, thanks to its veteran comedians, but is ultimately crippled by a weak script and a plot thinner than a fake gold chain.

Rating: 2 / 5


1. The Core Premise

Chennai City Gangsters doesn't try to be the next Vada Chennai or Pudhupettai. It knows exactly what it is: a parody of the very genre it borrows its name from. The story revolves around a trio of harmless, good-for-nothing friends led by Vaibhav. Frustrated with their mundane lives and inspired by the larger-than-life gangsters they see in movies, they decide to form their own "gang" to earn respect (and maybe some easy money) in their locality.

Their grand plan? To commit a petty crime that will make them infamous. But in a classic case of mistaken identity and being in the wrong place at the wrong time, they accidentally get entangled with a real, ruthless, and slightly eccentric gangster, 'Benne' Shankar (Anandraj). What follows is a chaotic cat-and-mouse game where the wannabe gangsters have to survive the very world they foolishly tried to enter.

2. The Highs: What Works

  • The Anandraj & Munishkanth Show: Let's be clear: the biggest reason to even consider watching this film is the veteran comedy duo. Anandraj, as the deadpan, menacing-but-clueless gangster 'Benne' Shankar, is the film's MVP. His stoic expressions and sudden bursts of frustration deliver the most consistent laughs. Munishkanth, as his bumbling right-hand man, is equally effective. Their chemistry is the comedic engine of the film, and every scene they are in is instantly elevated.

  • The Spoof Element: The film is at its best when it's actively making fun of gangster movie tropes. The trio's attempts to create a "gang theme song," their hilariously failed extortion attempts, and their understanding of the underworld being derived entirely from cinema are genuinely funny concepts.

  • Vaibhav's Relatability: Vaibhav has carved a niche for himself as the charming, relatable "boy-next-door" who gets into trouble, and he fits that role perfectly here. He is convincing as the naive leader of the pack, and his earnestness makes the audience root for him, even when the script doesn't give him much to work with.

3. The Lows: What Doesn't Work

  • The Wafer-Thin Screenplay: This is the film's Achilles' heel. The plot feels less like a cohesive story and more like a series of loosely connected comedy skits. The central conflict is set up early, but the narrative meanders without any real sense of urgency or rising stakes. The script, co-written and directed by Ghilli Sekar and Vikram Rajeshwar, lacks the tightness and cleverness needed to sustain a feature-length comedy.

  • Inconsistent and Repetitive Humor: While the veterans land their punches, a lot of the other humor falls flat. The jokes become repetitive, and the gags start to feel predictable as the film progresses. What's funny in the first half-hour becomes tiresome by the second hour.

  • Underdeveloped Characters: Beyond the central premise, none of the characters have any depth. Vaibhav's two friends are one-note caricatures. The female lead, played by Athulya Ravi, is disappointingly sidelined. She appears in a handful of scenes as the token love interest, and her character has absolutely no bearing on the main plot. It's a role that feels like a complete afterthought.

  • Pacing and Technical Aspects: The film suffers from serious pacing issues, especially in the second half, where it drags its feet towards a predictable climax. The music and background score are forgettable and do little to enhance the comedic timing. The dual-director approach might be a reason for the film's disjointed feel, as it lacks a singular, confident vision.

4. Performances

  • Vaibhav: Sincere and likable, but he is held back by a script that doesn't challenge him.

  • Anandraj: The undisputed star of the show. He's a comedic force of nature and saves many scenes from falling flat.

  • Munishkanth: Provides excellent support to Anandraj and delivers his lines with impeccable timing.

  • Athulya Ravi: Wasted in an insignificant role.

  • The Supporting Cast: A mixed bag of performances that don't leave a lasting impression.

Final Verdict

Chennai City Gangsters had a promising premise and the right comedians to pull off a hilarious gangster spoof. Unfortunately, it's a classic case of good ingredients being wasted by a poor recipe. The film relies too heavily on Anandraj and Munishkanth to carry the entire comedic load, while the core story remains weak and uninspired.

Who should watch it? If you are a die-hard fan of Anandraj's comedy and can forgive a non-existent plot for the sake of a few good laughs, you might find some fleeting enjoyment. For everyone else, this is a forgettable and skippable affair that fails to hit its target. It's a gangster film with no danger and a comedy with not enough consistent laughs.

« PREV
NEXT »

No comments